Prehistory
Template:Short description Template:Other uses Template:Pp {{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B=Template:DMCA{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown={{#switch:
{{#if:
| {{{demospace}}}
| {{#ifeq:|
| main
| other
}}
}}
| main = | other | #default = }}|preview=Page using Template:Use dmy dates with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| cs1-dates | date }}}}

Template:Human history and prehistory
Prehistory, also called pre-literary history,[1] is the period of human history between the first known use of stone tools by hominins Template:Circa million years ago and the beginning of recorded history with the invention of writing systems. The use of symbols, marks, and images appears very early among humans, but the earliest known writing systems appeared Template:Circa years ago. It took thousands of years for writing systems to be widely adopted, with writing having spread to almost all cultures by the 19th century. The end of prehistory therefore came at different times in different places, and the term is less often used in discussing societies where prehistory ended relatively recently. It is based on an old conception of history that without written records there could be no history. The most common conception today is that history is based on evidence, however the concept of prehistory has not been completely discarded.
In the early Bronze Age, Sumer in Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley Civilisation, and ancient Egypt were the first civilizations to develop their own scripts and keep historical records, with their neighbours following. Most other civilizations reached their end of prehistory during the following Iron Age. The three-age division of prehistory into Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age remains in use for much of Eurasia and North Africa, but is not generally used in those parts of the world where the working of hard metals arrived abruptly from contact with Eurasian cultures, such as Oceania, Australasia, much of Sub-Saharan Africa, and parts of the Americas. With some exceptions in pre-Columbian civilizations in the Americas, these areas did not develop writing systems before the arrival of Eurasians, so their prehistory reaches into relatively recent periods; for example, 1788 is usually taken as the end of the prehistory of Australia.
The period when a culture is written about by others, but has not developed its own writing system, is often known as the protohistory of the culture. By definition,[2] there are no written records from human prehistory, which can only be known from material archaeological and anthropological evidence: prehistoric materials and human remains. These were at first understood by the collection of folklore and by analogy with pre-literate societies observed in modern times. The key step to understanding prehistoric evidence is dating, and reliable dating techniques have developed steadily since the nineteenth century.[3] The most common of these dating techniques is radiocarbon dating.[4] Further evidence has come from the reconstruction of ancient spoken languages. More recent techniques include forensic chemical analysis to reveal the use and provenance of materials, and genetic analysis of bones to determine kinship and physical characteristics of prehistoric peoples.
Definition
Beginning and end
The beginning of prehistory is normally taken to be marked by human-like beings appearing on Earth.[5][6] The date marking its end is typically defined as the advent of the contemporary written historical record.[7][8]
Both dates consequently vary widely from region to region. For example, in European regions, prehistory cannot begin before Template:Circa million years ago, which is when the first signs of human presence have been found; however, Africa and Asia contain sites dated as early as Template:Circa and 1.8 million years ago, respectively.[9] Depending on the date when relevant records become a useful academic resource,[10] its end date also varies. For example, in Egypt it is generally accepted that prehistory ended around 3100 BCE, whereas in New Guinea the end of the prehistoric era is set much more recently, in the 1870s, when the Russian anthropologist Nicholai Miklukho-Maklai spent several years living among native peoples, and described their way of life in a comprehensive treatise. In Europe the relatively well-documented classical cultures of Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome had neighbouring cultures, including the Celts[11] and the Etruscans, with little writing.[12] Historians debate how much weight to give to the sometimes biased accounts of these protohistoric cultures found in Greek and Roman literature.[11]
Time periods
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} In dividing up human prehistory in Eurasia, historians typically use the three-age system, whereas scholars of pre-human time periods typically use the well-defined geologic record and its internationally defined stratum base within the geologic time scale. The three-age system is the periodization of human prehistory into three consecutive time periods, named for their predominant tool-making technologies: Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age.[13] In some areas, there is also a transition period between Stone Age and Bronze Age, the Chalcolithic or Copper Age.[14]
For the prehistory of the Americas see Pre-Columbian era.
History of the term
The notion of "prehistory" emerged during the Enlightenment in the work of antiquarians who used the word "primitive" to describe societies that existed before written records.[15] The word "prehistory" first appeared in English in 1836 in the Foreign Quarterly Review.[16]
The geologic time scale for pre-human time periods, and the three-age system for human prehistory, were systematised during the nineteenth century in the work of British, French, German, and Scandinavian anthropologists, archaeologists, and antiquarians.[17][13] An old conception of history is that without written records there could be no history. The most common conception today is that history is based on evidence, however the concept of prehistory has not been completely discarded.[18]Template:Rp
Means of research
The main source of information for prehistory is archaeology (a branch of anthropology), but some scholars are beginning to make more use of evidence from the natural and social sciences.[19][20][21]
The primary researchers into human prehistory are archaeologists and physical anthropologists who use excavation, geologic and geographic surveys, and other scientific analysis to reveal and interpret the nature and behavior of pre-literate and non-literate peoples.[6] Human population geneticists and historical linguists are also providing valuable insight.[5] Cultural anthropologists help provide context for societal interactions, by which objects of human origin pass among people, allowing an analysis of any article that arises in a human prehistoric context.[5] Therefore, data about prehistory is provided by a wide variety of natural and social sciences, such as anthropology, archaeology, archaeoastronomy, comparative linguistics, biology, geology, molecular genetics, paleontology, palynology, physical anthropology, and many others.
Human prehistory differs from history not only in terms of its chronology, but in the way it deals with the activities of archaeological cultures rather than named nations or individuals. Restricted to material processes, remains, and artefacts rather than written records, prehistory is anonymous. Because of this, reference terms that prehistorians use, such as "Neanderthal" or "Iron Age", are modern labels with definitions sometimes subject to debate.
Stone Age
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} The concept of a "Stone Age" is found useful in the archaeology of most of the world, although in the archaeology of the Americas it is called by different names and begins with a Lithic stage, or sometimes Paleo-Indian. The sub-divisions described below are used for Eurasia, and not consistently across the whole area.
Palaeolithic
"Palaeolithic" means "Old Stone Age", and begins with the first use of stone tools. The Paleolithic is the earliest period of the Stone Age. It extends from the earliest known use of stone tools by hominins Template:Circa million years ago, to the end of the Pleistocene Template:Circa BP (before the present period).[22]
The early part of the Palaeolithic is called the Lower Paleolithic (as in excavations it appears underneath the Upper Paleolithic), beginning with the earliest stone tools dated to around 3.3 million years ago at the Lomekwi site in Kenya.[23] These tools predate the genus Homo and were probably used by Kenyanthropus.[24] Evidence of control of fire by early hominins during the Lower Palaeolithic Era is uncertain and has at best limited scholarly support. The most widely accepted claim is that H. erectus or H. ergaster made fires between 790,000 and 690,000 BP in a site at Bnot Ya'akov Bridge, Israel. The use of fire enabled early humans to cook food, provide warmth, have a light source, deter animals at night and meditate.[25][26]
Early Homo sapiens originated some 300,000 years ago,<ref name="Irhoud">{{cite journal | vauthors = Hublin JJ, Ben-Ncer A, Bailey SE, Freidline SE, Neubauer S, Skinner MM, Bergmann I, Le Cabec A, Benazzi S, Harvati K, Gunz P | display-authors = 6 | title = New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens | journal = Nature | volume = 546 | issue = 7657 | pages = 289–292 | date = June 2017 | pmid = 28593953 | doi = 10.1038/nature22336 | bibcode = 2017Natur.546..289H | s2cid = 256771372 | url = https://kar.kent.ac.uk/62267/1/Submission_288356_1_art_file_2637492_j96j1b.pdf | access-date = 27 July 2022 | archive-date = 8 January 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200108234003/ht
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/prehistory | Cambridge Dictionary Entry: Prehistory }} {{#if: Cambridge University Press | Cambridge University Press. }} {{#if: 8 August 2017 | Accessed: 8 August 2017. }}
- ↑ Graslund, Bo. 1987. The birth of prehistoric chronology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- ↑ {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/what-is-carbon-14-dating#:~:text=Radiocarbon%20dating,%20or%20carbon-14,of%20the%20carbon-14%20isotope. | What is Carbon Dating? | University of Chicago News }} {{#if: | {{{publisher}}}. }} {{#if: 2024-10-21 | Accessed: 2024-10-21. }}
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Renfrew, Colin. 2008. Prehistory: The Making of the Human Mind. New York: Modern Library
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Fagan, Brian. (2007). World Prehistory: A brief introduction New York: Prentice-Hall, (Seventh ed.), Chapter One
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: https://www.greecehighdefinition.com/blog/2021/2/9/viewing-the-ancient-celts-through-the-lens-of-greece-and-rome | Viewing the Ancient Celts through the Lens of Greece and Rome }} {{#if: | {{{publisher}}}. }} {{#if: | Accessed: {{{access-date}}}. }}
- ↑ {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/etla/hd_etla.htm | Etruscan Language and Inscriptions | Essay | The Metropolitan Museum of Art | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History }} {{#if: | {{{publisher}}}. }} {{#if: | Accessed: {{{access-date}}}. }}
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/x13740 | Chalcolithic | British Museum }} {{#if: | {{{publisher}}}. }} {{#if: 6 March 2023 | Accessed: 6 March 2023. }}
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ Template:Cite book OCLC 1379265149.
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ The Prehistory of Iberia: Debating Early Social Stratification and the State edited by María Cruz Berrocal, Leonardo García Sanjuán, Antonio Gilman. Pg 36.
- ↑ Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge. Edited by Pedro Paulo A. Funari, Martin Hall, Sian Jones. p. 8.ISBN 9780415518888
- ↑ Through the Ages in Palestinian Archaeology: An Introductory Handbook. By Walter E. Ras. p. 49.ISBN 9781563380556
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ Harmand et al., 2015, p. 315.
- ↑ {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/early-human-fire-natural-environment/ | How Early Humans Shaped the World With Fire }} {{#if: | {{{publisher}}}. }} {{#if: | Accessed: {{{access-date}}}. }}
- ↑ {{#if: | {{{author}}} }} {{#if: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/fire-good-make-human-inspiration-happen-132494650/ | Fire Good. Make Human Inspiration Happen. }} {{#if: | {{{publisher}}}. }} {{#if: | Accessed: {{{access-date}}}. }}
